# Example Motion Report > A complete $29 Motion Report from a real scan, published in full: score, WCAG 2.2.2 / 2.3.3 citations, every candidate with its fix. Read the deliverable before you buy it. > Source: https://motionspec.dev/report-example > Free check: https://motionspec.dev/motion-check · Pricing: https://motionspec.dev/pricing#p-report This is a real report, not a mock-up. It was produced on 29 August 2026 by the same renderer that runs when you buy a Motion Report, fed by the same live scan engine. Every candidate, every WCAG citation and every fix below comes out of an actual scan. The page it scans is our own /before-after demo, which deliberately ships motion the checker should flag — six infinite animations with no pause path (WCAG 2.2.2, Level A) and several animation layers sitting outside the prefers-reduced-motion guard (WCAG 2.3.3) — so the report has something to show. A clean page produces a much shorter report; the scoring, the sections and the disclosures are identical. Run the free check on your own page → · What a report costs → Motion Spec motionspec.dev — motion accessibility, static scan of 29 August 2026 Motion Accessibility Report https://motionspec.dev/before-after Report ID example-2026-08-29 Date 29 August 2026 Scan type Static scan (scoring v2) Prepared by MotionSpec — Froeba Sales Solutions UG 26 /100 High motion-accessibility risk ▲ study median 35 Engineering report — not legal compliance evidence. Motion/animation scope only (WCAG 2.2.2, 2.3.3, prefers-reduced-motion). Not an EN 301 549 audit. Full terms on the last page. Motion Spec example-2026-08-29 · motionspec.dev · 29 August 2026 Executive summary 13 distinct motion-a11y root cause(s), 14 occurrence(s), in the static scan. Score: 26/100 — High motion-accessibility risk This score is higher than 82 of the 196 pages in the study, and level with 2 of them. Benchmark population: the July 2026 MotionSpec “State of Motion” study — 196 production pages generated by five AI app-builder platforms, scanned with this same engine and scoring (v2). It benchmarks against AI-generated UIs, not the general web. Scores in that population cluster on a few values, so this report gives raw counts only: any single summary figure would suggest a precision these clustered scores do not carry. How this page compares with the study population Measure This page 196-page study (AI-generated UIs, July 2026) Score (v2) 26/100 median 35/100 Motion without a reduced-motion guard Yes present on 190 of 196 pages Infinite animation without a pause path (WCAG 2.2.2, Level A) Yes present on 130 of 196 pages Statically clean (no candidates) No 6 of 196 pages Top candidates Severity Candidate (root cause) Occurrences Score impact High Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A 1× −20 High Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A 1× −20 High Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A 1× −20 The highest-priority candidates are the infinite animations without a pause path — WCAG 2.2.2 (Pause, Stop, Hide) is a Level-A criterion, the strictest conformance tier, and continuous movement is a real barrier for people with attention and vestibular conditions. The unguarded-motion candidates are animation that, as scanned, still runs when a visitor’s OS-level “reduce motion” setting is on; a single prefers-reduced-motion media query per animation layer usually clears this class in one change. The matching criterion, WCAG 2.3.3, is Level AAA — so this is a robustness gap, not a Level-A conformance failure. The suggested fixes in this report are CSS-only and incremental — none require redesigning the page. After deploying, re-run the free checker to see the new scan result. MotionSpec Motion Accessibility Report example-2026-08-29 Motion Spec example-2026-08-29 · motionspec.dev · 29 August 2026 Candidates in detail Candidates are grouped by root cause: one CSS root cause (a @keyframes animation or a transition layer) applied to N selectors is one candidate with N occurrences — not N candidates. Groups are ordered by their score impact. Candidates describe the page as scanned: they are engineering observations to check, not confirmed defects and not a judgement of the team that built it. 1. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:logosway Where: .wavemark Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .wavemark { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 2. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:kenburns Where: .bgfx Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .bgfx { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 3. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:pulse Where: .cta Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .cta { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 4. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:spin Where: .spinner Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .spinner { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 5. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:scrollx Where: .track Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .track { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 6. Infinite animation without pause path (no animation-play-state / data-* toggle) High WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide — Level A · 1 occurrence · score impact −20 · root cause: keyframes:bounce Where: .cue span Suggested fix Make it pausable: html[data-ms-paused] .cue span { animation-play-state: paused !important; } + pause button. 7. Transitions without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 2 occurrences · score impact −11.2 · root cause: transition:(unguarded) Where: .slider · .slider::before Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { * { transition: none !important; } } — or guard the transition utilities layer. 8. Motion without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 1 occurrence · score impact −8 · root cause: keyframes:kenburns Where: .bgfx Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .bgfx { animation: none; transition: none; } } 9. Motion without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 1 occurrence · score impact −8 · root cause: keyframes:pulse Where: .cta Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .cta { animation: none; transition: none; } } 10. Motion without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 1 occurrence · score impact −8 · root cause: keyframes:spin Where: .spinner Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .spinner { animation: none; transition: none; } } 11. Motion without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 1 occurrence · score impact −8 · root cause: keyframes:scrollx Where: .track Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .track { animation: none; transition: none; } } 12. Motion without prefers-reduced-motion guard Medium WCAG 2.3.3 (Level AAA) / prefers-reduced-motion best practice · 1 occurrence · score impact −8 · root cause: keyframes:bounce Where: .cue span Suggested fix @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .cue span { animation: none; transition: none; } } 13. Animated non-transform/opacity propert(ies): background Low Best practice — compositor-safe animation (performance + vestibular safety) · 1 occurrence · score impact −4 · root cause: props:background Where: .slider Suggested fix Animate only transform/opacity (compositor-safe), e.g. transform instead of background. MotionSpec Motion Accessibility Report example-2026-08-29 Motion Spec example-2026-08-29 · motionspec.dev · 29 August 2026 Scan coverage & disclosures No coverage limitations were flagged for this scan beyond the general static-scan scope described under Methodology. Methodology What we test Static scan of the page HTML, inline style blocks and up to 12 linked stylesheets (8 s fetch timeout per resource, 2 MB cap per resource), as served at scan time. Infinite/long animation without a pause path — CSS animations with infinite iteration (or >5 s autoplay) and deprecated , with no detectable pause/stop mechanism. Mapped to WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (Level A) . Motion without a prefers-reduced-motion guard — animations/transitions that run even when the visitor's OS asks for reduced motion. Mapped to WCAG 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions (Level AAA) and reduced-motion best practice; this is a robustness gap, not a Level-A failure. Risky animated properties — animating properties other than transform / opacity (layout/paint work; vestibular and performance risk). Best-practice candidate. Scoring (v2) scoring v2: 100 minus, per root-cause group (same kind + same keyframes/transition-props/selector-family), severity-weight x min(3, 1 + 0.4*log2(occurrences)); per-category caps (infinite/marquee 40, autoplay 25, unguarded 30, risky-props 15) so one issue class cannot zero the score alone; floor 0. What we do not test Runtime JavaScript motion (WAAPI, GSAP, JS-driven scroll effects). Where the scan detects runtime-motion libraries it discloses them above as not audited — the score is a lower bound on motion risk, not proof of absence. Video, GIF and canvas/WebGL content; flashing-content analysis (WCAG 2.3.1) beyond CSS motion. Post-interaction states behind logins, cookie walls or client-side routing. Everything outside motion: this is not a general accessibility audit and not an EN 301 549 assessment. Reference population Comparison figures come from the MotionSpec State of Motion in AI-Generated UIs study (Motion Accessibility Index #1, July 2026): 196 publicly accessible production pages generated by five AI app-builder platforms (anonymized cohorts A–E), scanned with this same engine and scoring. Dataset: CC BY 4.0, motionspec.dev/blog/state-of-motion-ai-generated-uis . MotionSpec Motion Accessibility Report example-2026-08-29 Motion Spec example-2026-08-29 · motionspec.dev · 29 August 2026 Scope, terms & imprint Scope disclaimer Engineering report — not legal compliance evidence. Motion/animation scope only (WCAG 2.2.2, 2.3.3, prefers-reduced-motion). Not an EN 301 549 audit. This is an automated, point-in-time engineering assessment based on publicly reachable pages. It is not a legal compliance determination. Prepared for the buyer's internal use; please do not redistribute or use it to make public claims about third-party sites. Refunds If this report is not useful to you, email hello@motionspec.dev within 14 days , quoting the report number above, and we refund the purchase in full — no questions asked. Re-checks The scan reflects the page as served on 29 August 2026. After you ship fixes, you can re-check the page free of charge at any time: motionspec.dev/motion-check . Questions Write to hello@motionspec.dev and quote the report number above. Imprint / Impressum: Froeba Sales Solutions UG (haftungsbeschränkt) — MotionSpec, hello@motionspec.dev. Report example-2026-08-29, generated 29 August 2026 from a static scan of https://motionspec.dev/before-after. MotionSpec is an EU trademark application of Froeba Sales Solutions UG. WCAG is a trademark of the W3C. This document cites WCAG success criteria for engineering orientation only. MotionSpec Motion Accessibility Report example-2026-08-29 · end of report